JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Insor·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-198/22, instaurada por el Instituto Nacional de Sordos (INSOR).

De manera específica se pidió aclarar la orden segunda de la parte resolutiva, respecto al término de ejecutoria del fallo.

Luego de verificar que la entidad peticionaria fue debidamente notificada, la Corte decidió RECHAZAR la aclaración pretendida, por haber sido presentada de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (11 points)
  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de aclaración presentada por el INSOR respecto de la orden segunda de la Sentencia T-198 de 2022.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR esta providencia al peticionario.
  3. TERCERO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
  4. Comuníquese y cúmplase,
  5. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  6. Magistrada
  7. NATALIA ÁNGEL CABO
  8. Magistrada
  9. JOSE FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  10. Magistrado
  11. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Reporting justice
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Natalia Ángel Cabo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.